# Equivalence induction ```agda module foundation.equivalence-induction where ``` <details><summary>Imports</summary> ```agda open import foundation.dependent-pair-types open import foundation.identity-systems open import foundation.subuniverses open import foundation.univalence open import foundation.universal-property-identity-systems open import foundation.universe-levels open import foundation-core.commuting-triangles-of-maps open import foundation-core.contractible-maps open import foundation-core.equivalences open import foundation-core.function-types open import foundation-core.identity-types open import foundation-core.postcomposition-functions open import foundation-core.sections open import foundation-core.torsorial-type-families ``` </details> ## Idea **Equivalence induction** is the principle asserting that for any type family ```text P : (B : š°) (e : A ā B) ā š° ``` of types indexed by all [equivalences](foundation.equivalences.md) with domain `A`, there is a [section](foundation.sections.md) of the evaluation map ```text ((B : š°) (e : A ā B) ā P B e) ā P A id-equiv. ``` The principle of equivalence induction is equivalent to the [univalence axiom](foundation.univalence.md). By equivalence induction, it follows that any type family `P : š° ā š±` on the universe has an [action on equivalences](foundation.action-on-equivalences-type-families.md) ```text (A ā B) ā P A ā P B. ``` ## Definitions ### Evaluation at the identity equivalence ```agda module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {A : UU l1} where ev-id-equiv : (P : (B : UU l1) ā (A ā B) ā UU l2) ā ((B : UU l1) (e : A ā B) ā P B e) ā P A id-equiv ev-id-equiv P f = f A id-equiv triangle-ev-id-equiv : (P : (Ī£ (UU l1) (A ā_)) ā UU l2) ā coherence-triangle-maps ( ev-point (A , id-equiv)) ( ev-id-equiv (Ī» X e ā P (X , e))) ( ev-pair) triangle-ev-id-equiv P f = refl ``` ### The equivalence induction principle ```agda module _ {l1 : Level} (A : UU l1) where induction-principle-equivalences : UUĻ induction-principle-equivalences = is-identity-system (Ī» (B : UU l1) ā A ā B) A id-equiv ``` ## Properties ### Contractibility of the total space of equivalences implies equivalence induction ```agda module _ {l1 : Level} {A : UU l1} where abstract is-identity-system-is-torsorial-equiv : is-torsorial (Ī» (B : UU l1) ā A ā B) ā is-identity-system (A ā_) A id-equiv is-identity-system-is-torsorial-equiv = is-identity-system-is-torsorial A id-equiv ``` ### Equivalence induction implies contractibility of the total space of equivalences ```agda module _ {l1 : Level} {A : UU l1} where abstract is-torsorial-equiv-induction-principle-equivalences : induction-principle-equivalences A ā is-torsorial (Ī» (B : UU l1) ā A ā B) is-torsorial-equiv-induction-principle-equivalences = is-torsorial-is-identity-system A id-equiv abstract is-torsorial-is-identity-system-equiv : is-identity-system (A ā_) A id-equiv ā is-torsorial (Ī» (B : UU l1) ā A ā B) is-torsorial-is-identity-system-equiv = is-torsorial-is-identity-system A id-equiv ``` ### Equivalence induction in a universe ```agda module _ {l1 : Level} {A : UU l1} where abstract is-identity-system-equiv : induction-principle-equivalences A is-identity-system-equiv = is-identity-system-is-torsorial-equiv (is-torsorial-equiv A) ind-equiv : {l2 : Level} (P : (B : UU l1) ā A ā B ā UU l2) ā P A id-equiv ā {B : UU l1} (e : A ā B) ā P B e ind-equiv P p {B} = pr1 (is-identity-system-equiv P) p B compute-ind-equiv : {l2 : Level} (P : (B : UU l1) ā A ā B ā UU l2) ā (u : P A id-equiv) ā ind-equiv P u id-equiv ļ¼ u compute-ind-equiv P = pr2 (is-identity-system-equiv P) ``` ### Equivalence induction in a subuniverse ```agda module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} (P : subuniverse l1 l2) (A : type-subuniverse P) where ev-id-equiv-subuniverse : {F : (B : type-subuniverse P) ā equiv-subuniverse P A B ā UU l3} ā ((B : type-subuniverse P) (e : equiv-subuniverse P A B) ā F B e) ā F A id-equiv ev-id-equiv-subuniverse f = f A id-equiv triangle-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse : (F : (B : type-subuniverse P) ā equiv-subuniverse P A B ā UU l3) ā coherence-triangle-maps ( ev-point (A , id-equiv)) ( ev-id-equiv-subuniverse {F}) ( ev-pair) triangle-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse F E = refl abstract is-identity-system-equiv-subuniverse : (F : (B : type-subuniverse P) ā equiv-subuniverse P A B ā UU l3) ā section (ev-id-equiv-subuniverse {F}) is-identity-system-equiv-subuniverse = is-identity-system-is-torsorial A id-equiv ( is-torsorial-equiv-subuniverse P A) ind-equiv-subuniverse : (F : (B : type-subuniverse P) ā equiv-subuniverse P A B ā UU l3) ā F A id-equiv ā (B : type-subuniverse P) (e : equiv-subuniverse P A B) ā F B e ind-equiv-subuniverse F = pr1 (is-identity-system-equiv-subuniverse F) compute-ind-equiv-subuniverse : (F : (B : type-subuniverse P) ā equiv-subuniverse P A B ā UU l3) ā (u : F A id-equiv) ā ind-equiv-subuniverse F u A id-equiv ļ¼ u compute-ind-equiv-subuniverse F = pr2 (is-identity-system-equiv-subuniverse F) ``` ### The evaluation map `ev-id-equiv` is an equivalence ```agda module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {A : UU l1} (P : (B : UU l1) (e : A ā B) ā UU l2) where is-equiv-ev-id-equiv : is-equiv (ev-id-equiv P) is-equiv-ev-id-equiv = dependent-universal-property-identity-system-is-torsorial ( id-equiv) (is-torsorial-equiv A) P is-contr-map-ev-id-equiv : is-contr-map (ev-id-equiv P) is-contr-map-ev-id-equiv = is-contr-map-is-equiv is-equiv-ev-id-equiv ``` ### The evaluation map `ev-id-equiv-subuniverse` is an equivalence ```agda module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} (P : subuniverse l1 l2) (X : type-subuniverse P) (F : (Y : type-subuniverse P) (e : equiv-subuniverse P X Y) ā UU l3) where is-equiv-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse : is-equiv (ev-id-equiv-subuniverse P X {F}) is-equiv-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse = dependent-universal-property-identity-system-is-torsorial ( id-equiv) (is-torsorial-equiv-subuniverse P X) F is-contr-map-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse : is-contr-map (ev-id-equiv-subuniverse P X {F}) is-contr-map-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse = is-contr-map-is-equiv is-equiv-ev-id-equiv-subuniverse ``` ### Equivalence induction implies that postcomposing by an equivalence is an equivalence Of course we already know that this fact follows from [function extensionality](foundation.function-extensionality.md). However, we prove it again from equivalence induction so that we can prove that [univalence implies function extensionality](foundation.univalence-implies-function-extensionality.md). ```agda abstract is-equiv-postcomp-univalence : {l1 l2 : Level} {X Y : UU l1} (A : UU l2) (e : X ā Y) ā is-equiv (postcomp A (map-equiv e)) is-equiv-postcomp-univalence A = ind-equiv (Ī» Y e ā is-equiv (postcomp A (map-equiv e))) is-equiv-id ```